Freak 1932. Tom Browning’s movie

The Real Freaks

Now almost anyone can be described as  freak.

Within the  baleful  cathodic jarring images of poor visual landscape of any viewers, indeed, anyone can be a  geek ,  freak  or  frik . Freak, from English:  strange, extravagant, but the real freaks , as a concept is something that comes from the last century. Let’s go through its intrahistory…

Still not admitted as such in the dictionary of the RAE, but understandable for everyone.

Like everything in life, there was a beginning, a beginning, some  first  freaks  that were real, and that were made known by the hand of Cinema…


The history of “freakism”, if that term is acceptable, starts directly from  Tod Browning’s film  entitled ” La Parada de los Monstruos ” in Spanish, ” Freak ” in its original version.

In 1932, a year after filming the acclaimed “Dracula” with  Bela Lugosi , Browning, perhaps prematurely anticipating modernity, directed this film whose action focuses on a circus, where a more than curious group of “different people” meets, Which show characteristics that deviate from «normal». Deformed, with physical defects, dwarfs, Siamese sisters, even the bearded woman.

The cinematographic proposal, contrary to the cliché that was normally presented in those years, the incipient beginnings of modern cinema, and in which the spectator waited seated in the cinema seat with a smile on his face ready for the “happy ending”, it presents us, we say, a story in which beauty hides, taking the viewer to the limit by questioning whether what he is contemplating is a drama or a horror film.

Something never seen until then, and less in that way presented, with such packaging. Anyway, friend, sit in front of the television, today, observe Jorge Jacinto, or whatever his name is, Nobody’s Islands … And analyze 

The cinematic plot of the real freaks

The story is simple:  Hans, a dwarf, is seduced by the acrobat, named Cleopatra. But Cleopatra has a lover:  Hercules , of course: the strongman from the circus.

In reality, the acrobat and Hercules try to take away Hans’s fortune, however the intervention of  the real freaks of the circus , friends of Hans, changes their plans and gives a turn to the cinematographic narrative.

The criticism was devastating . The film was described as ” abhorrent, obscene or grotesque “. The Kansas City Star newspaper, where Hemingway did more than his journalistic steps , for example, accused Browning of doing it with the sole objective of making money, when the reality was quite different since if the collection was around 165,000 dollars , the production had exceeded 300,000.

In the press the aversion produced by the film was constantly reproduced, which was translated into a social reaction that precipitated its censorship.

Browning, with a career truffled with successes, with more than forty films shot, unsurprisingly, took the worst part. He was even accused that the production of “Freaks” had required the intervention of a  weak mind , in addition to claiming that watching it required a “strong stomach.”

Haunting environment

It is true that some scenes and the accumulation of shots in which the “monsters” appear, in addition to the  disturbing atmosphere and violence present , lead us to understand that in the 1930s, the film caused a sensation.

It is also true that Browning, or at least the marketing campaign that accompanied the film,  sought to impress audiences .

No special effects or makeup was needed, because the actors were real, absolutely authentic, as well as unknown.

During the preparation of the film,  the casting director toured circuses photographing those characters with  sufficient deformities or peculiarities so that later, when Browning contemplated them, he could select the most suitable ones.

A foreseeable scandal for Freaks, a cult film

If in the United States the scandal accompanied the film, the same would happen in Europe. What is clear is that “Freaks” has become, over the decades, a cult film and a reference for a good number of creators, directors, who have made their cinema, in many cases , admirable oddities.

The list would be endless, but they would undoubtedly highlight such relevant names as  David Lynch  or  Tim Burton . And all those directors who, for our enjoyment, look for dark sides of reality.

Some Curiosities about «Freaks»

Although the entire film is a curiosity in itself, including the life of its director, they highlight some events and events that we highlight below.

As for  Browning , it can be said that at a very young age, at the age of sixteen, he  began working in the circus world . In fact, it was there that they began to call him ” Tod “, which means ” fox ” or ” trickster “. Browning was a presenter, contortionist, also dedicating himself to magic.

At the end of filming, many meters of film were discarded . In fact, the first presumed drawbacks with criticism and censorship were detected in the preview, so the duration was cut from ninety to sixty-four minutes, also adding a kind of prologue and a more sweetened epilogue. The film has a harmonious beginning and ending.

The filming  also raised a lot of headaches for Tod Browning, it is even said that it was carried out with enough secrecy to  avoid accusations of the exploitation of people with defects , “unfortunate or monstrous”, something that should be seen normally in the world circus where they worked, but that it should not be so much transferred to the world of the Seventh Art.

From the discarded parts of the footage, a supposed ending stands out  , inadvertently in these lines revealing the end of the original version, we can say that after Cleopatra appeared, Hercules appears in the shot singing with a very fine voice, which implied that he had been castrated.

In conclusion

Perhaps because of the success in his professional career, because of his previous productions and because of the expectations created with the film, it is said that Browning had to face  salary demands  on the part of the actors who played the roles of “Freaks.” It is probable that they intuited, of course mistakenly, that this whole adventure was going to be a box office success.

Without being able to confirm this point with certainty, it is said that  “Freaks” is  currently censored in Finland . In England it was given the X rating in the 1960s.

To know more:

Basic myths of horror movies ; compilation and prologue by Juan Antonio Molina Foix. Nostromo.

Is the video of Bruce Lee playing ping pong real?

Check out the following video. It’s about Bruce Lee playing ping pong with some nunchucks. The images are spectacular …

But this sporting boast is not real. Unfortunately.

As a full version of the video shows, which can be seen below these lines, the recording is only a “digital creation” intended to develop an advertising campaign that intended to go viral (and it succeeded) to promote the Nokia N96 Limited Edition phone. Bruce Lee , produced in 2008, thirty-five years after Lee’s death, who is still in fashion, even appearing, figuratively, in the recently released Tarantino film Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

Nokia N96 (Limited Edition Bruce Lee) phone advertising images

This advertising work was carried out by the advertising agency JWT (J. Walter Thompson), located in Beijing.

In the video we think we see Bruce Lee himself, but it was not him but a double who, in the distance, seems the real one. The movements synchronized with the sounds of a real ping pong match, adding the audio and visual image of the ball added to the clip in post-production, generate the idea of a real match where Lee does not miss a ball, returning it. with the rotundity of his martial art.

In addition, the year 2008 marked the 30th anniversary of the (strange) death of Bruce Lee, which was also a source of inspiration for the advertising agency, by way of tribute: “Our task was to make people feel excited. Enough to visit the Nokia website and make the Nokia N96 Bruce Lee Limited Edition visible, not to communicate a complete and independent product selling proposition, which is the goal behind most TV commercials. JWT agency, to which they added: “Bruce Lee had ‘very’ amazing skills and we knew we had to be true to the legend. Fortunately, we also have a ‘very open’ client who advocates and knows the value of great creativity ‘.

And the campaign was a success, in just twenty-four hours they had exceeded 700,000 views.

The advertising campaign began as a fictional game, but that was only the beginning, soon after the full version was launched with the image of the product and the address of the website where the public could gather more information about the product, which was from ‘ limited edition’. Without a doubt, an original idea.

This is how Bruce Lee handled the nunchucks … in the movies …

Did Sherlock Holmes exist? The true history

Detective Sherlock Holmes is real or made up?

It may be that, jokingly or seriously, many people for a long time sent letters addressed to Mr. Sherlock Holmes at 221a Baker Street, the fictional home of a fictional character turned real.
The great fondness for the novels written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle led to this phenomenon.

Sherlock Holmes But evidently the detective was conceived by the imagination of his creator. Although the character is based on a real person named Joseph Bell, a nursing doctor from Edinburgh.

According to Conan Doyle’s own description, the teaching physician was “thin, wiry, with black hair, a sharp face and a powerful nose.”

Bell was a skilled surgeon who stood out for his accurate diagnoses.

Conan Doyle was his student and assistant in the care of his patients. Doyle was in charge of giving the appointment time and making a summary of the specific case.

Did Sherlock Holmes exist?

These cases were transferred to practical classes observed by a good number of students.

When Conan Doyle communicated to his teacher his intention to create the literary detective based on his deductive ability, Joseph Bell was delighted. He even lent ideas that, apparently, the writer did not put into practice.

Sherringford o Sherlock

Conan Doyle also drew inspiration from Edgar Allan Poe’s researcher Dupin.

Before calling him Sherlock Holmes, he considered other names such as Sherringford, but preferred Sherlock, which was “a name sharp as the blade of a knife.”